GLM 5.2 DESTROYS Claude Code?

Get the Agent OS & GLM System 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about Want to make money and save time with AI? Join here: https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about Video notes + links to the tools 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-profit-lab-7462/about Get a FREE AI Course + Community + 1,000 AI Agents 👉 https://www.skool.com/ai-seo-with-julian-goldie-1553/about Get a FREE AI SEO Strategy Session → https://go.juliangoldie.com/strategy-session?utm=julian Get 200+ Free AI SEO Prompts → https://go.juliangoldie.com/chat-gpt-prompts Get out SEO link building book here 👉 https://go.juliangoldie.com/opt-in?utm=julian GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 (and Kimi K2.7): Side-by-Side Coding & Game Tests + Benchmarks The video compares GLM 5.2 against Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K2.7 through side-by-side creative coding tests (raycaster engines, neon city flight, racing, solar system, voxel runner, liquid-in-a-bowl interaction, and landing pages) and discusses benchmark results and practical tradeoffs. Opus 4.8 generally produces smoother, more playable outputs and leads several tests, while GLM 5.2 wins some rounds (notably a labeled, interactive solar system, voxel runner, and the liquid demo) and scores #1 on Design Arena. The script emphasizes GLM 5.2 being MIT-licensed open source on Hugging Face and available via Ollama, cheaper on a coding plan, and easier to plug into agents via OAuth, while Claude is described as stronger overall but less flexible without paid API access. It also promotes an “agent operating system” and the AI Profit Boardroom community for setup files, tutorials, and coaching. 00:00 GLM 5.2 vs Claude 00:43 Open Source Advantages 02:12 Raycaster Showdown 03:21 Upgraded Raycaster 04:25 Neon City Flight 05:13 Racing And Solar 06:19 Voxel Runner Winner 07:13 Liquid Bowl Test 07:41 Benchmarks Breakdown 09:44 Landing Page Faceoff 10:15 Final Verdict 10:46 Agent OS Integration 11:17 Boardroom Pitch 13:19 Wrap Up