Gemini 3.5 FLASH: BAD to OUTSTANDING

Discover AI · Beginner ·🧠 Large Language Models ·2h ago
The newly available Gemini 3.5 FLASH AI model tested on my own causal REASONING TEST. Since I test this reasoning model on "HIGH", the end result is excellent. But analyzing the reasoning trace of Gemini 3.5 FLASH in details shows, any exit before 5 minutes pure runtime (on Google TPU) would have delivered a "bad" (10 step solution) qualitative result. Multiple other tests with "MEDIUM" reasoning (not recorded) confirm this feeling. Note: This test is not a statistically significant event and only present a single test for a very limited number of repetitions. Therefore the result of my test is just for a first feeling, regarding the new GEMINI 3.5 FLASH. #airesearch #aiexplained #geminiai #googledeepmind
Watch on YouTube ↗ (saves to browser)
Sign in to unlock AI tutor explanation · ⚡30

Related AI Lessons

The RAG tool that auto-generates Q&A pairs from your documents
Learn to auto-generate Q&A pairs from documents using RAG tool and improve your document management
Dev.to · retrovirusretro
How to Build Secure AI: Implementing Guardrails for Enterprise LLM
Learn to build secure AI by implementing guardrails for enterprise LLMs, going beyond prompt engineering safety for production-ready defense-in-depth architecture
Medium · LLM
5 Chinese AI tools with 100K+ stars that the West is ignoring
Discover 5 Chinese AI tools with 100K+ stars on GitHub that the Western world is overlooking, and learn how to explore and utilize them
Dev.to AI
OpenAI claims it solved an 80-year-old math problem — for real this time
OpenAI's reasoning model claims to have solved an 80-year-old math problem, with mathematicians verifying its solution
TechCrunch AI
Up next
5 Levels of AI Agents - From Simple LLM Calls to Multi-Agent Systems
Dave Ebbelaar (LLM Eng)
Watch →