Erfan Shayegani - Just Do It!? Computer-Use Agents Exhibit Blind Goal-Directedness
00:00 Intro and Paper Overview
00:46 What Are Computer Use Agents
02:50 Safety Focus and Blind Goal Directedness
07:37 Pattern One Context Failures
13:45 Pattern Two Risky Assumptions
17:47 Pattern Three Infeasible Goals
20:02 BlindAct Benchmark Setup
23:45 Evaluation With LLM Judges
25:20 Results BGD vs Completion
31:41 Prompting Mitigations Limits
35:03 Qualitative Failure Modes
39:51 Q&A and Closing
In this talk Erfan will talk about adversarial attacks on multi-modal language models.
Computer-Use Agents (CUAs) are an increasingly deployed class of agents that take actions on GUIs to accomplish user goals. In this paper, we show that CUAs consistently exhibit Blind Goal-Directedness (BGD): a bias to pursue goals regardless of feasibility, safety, reliability, or context. We characterize three prevalent patterns of BGD: (i) lack of contextual reasoning, (ii) assumptions and decisions under ambiguity, and (iii) contradictory or infeasible goals. We develop BLIND-ACT, a benchmark of 90 tasks capturing these three patterns. Built on OSWorld, BLIND-ACT provides realistic environments and employs LLM-based judges to evaluate agent behavior, achieving 93.75% agreement with human annotations. We use BLIND-ACT to evaluate nine frontier models, including Claude Sonnet and Opus 4, Computer-Use-Preview, and GPT-5, observing high average BGD rates (80.8%) across them. We show that BGD exposes subtle risks that arise even when inputs are not directly harmful. While prompting-based interventions lower BGD levels, substantial risk persists, highlighting the need for stronger training- or inference-time interventions. Qualitative analysis reveals observed failure modes: execution-first bias (focusing on how to act over whether to act), thought–action disconnect (execution diverging from reasoning), and request-primacy (justifying actions due to user request). Identifying BGD and introducing BLIND-ACT establishes a foundation for future research on studying and mitigating this f
Watch on YouTube ↗
(saves to browser)
Sign in to unlock AI tutor explanation · ⚡30
More on: AI Alignment Basics
View skill →Related AI Lessons
⚡
⚡
⚡
⚡
SpaceX Listed Grok's ‘Spicy’ Mode as a Risk in Its IPO Filing
Wired AI
Raising a Good Junior: What AI Gets Wrong About Knowledge and What It Means for the Next Generation
Dev.to · Andre Faria
The Observability Crisis in AI Systems: Why Your Logs Are Lying to You
Hackernoon
My BlueDot Technical AI Safety Participation Experience
Medium · Machine Learning
Chapters (12)
Intro and Paper Overview
0:46
What Are Computer Use Agents
2:50
Safety Focus and Blind Goal Directedness
7:37
Pattern One Context Failures
13:45
Pattern Two Risky Assumptions
17:47
Pattern Three Infeasible Goals
20:02
BlindAct Benchmark Setup
23:45
Evaluation With LLM Judges
25:20
Results BGD vs Completion
31:41
Prompting Mitigations Limits
35:03
Qualitative Failure Modes
39:51
Q&A and Closing
🎓
Tutor Explanation
DeepCamp AI