Why We Removed All Reactive Code From Our Spring Boot Services (And Throughput Went Up)
📰 Medium · Programming
Learn how removing reactive code from Spring Boot services improved throughput and why blocking IO was preferred over non-blocking WebFlux
Action Steps
- Assess current system performance using metrics and monitoring tools
- Identify bottlenecks and areas where reactive code is used
- Replace reactive code with blocking IO alternatives
- Test and measure the impact on system throughput and latency
- Configure and optimize blocking IO settings for better performance
Who Needs to Know This
Developers and architects on a team benefit from understanding the trade-offs between reactive and blocking IO, as it impacts system performance and maintainability
Key Insight
💡 Reactive code doesn't always mean better performance, and blocking IO can be a viable alternative
Share This
💡 Ditching reactive code for blocking IO improved throughput in Spring Boot services
Key Takeaways
Learn how removing reactive code from Spring Boot services improved throughput and why blocking IO was preferred over non-blocking WebFlux
DeepCamp AI